Under what circumstance can an officer legally use non-deadly force?

The legal use of non-deadly force by an officer is justified primarily in situations where it is necessary to prevent a suspect from escaping custody. This is important for maintaining public safety and ensuring that those who are suspected of a crime are held accountable for their actions. When an officer is making an arrest or detaining an individual, they have the authority to use non-deadly force to effectively control the situation and prevent the suspect from fleeing, especially if there is a reasonable belief that the suspect poses a risk of escape.

This principle is rooted in the broader context of an officer's duty to uphold the law and maintain order within the community. The use of non-deadly force must be proportional to the threat presented by the suspect. If the suspect is attempting to escape and could potentially evade legal consequences for their actions, then the officer is legally justified in employing non-deadly measures to prevent that escape.

In contrast, the other options do not align with the legal standards for the use of non-deadly force. Retaliation and intimidation are not permissible uses of force, as they do not meet the requirements of necessity and reasonableness that govern law enforcement practices. Forcibly removing a suspect from a vehicle can be legally