In which circumstance is less force typically justified for officers?

Less force is typically justified when facing passive resistance because passive resistance involves an individual who is not physically attempting to harm the officer or others. This type of resistance can take forms such as non-compliance without aggression, where an individual may refuse to follow commands but poses no immediate threat. In such cases, officers are trained to employ de-escalation techniques and less confrontational approaches, as excessive force could escalate the situation unnecessarily and lead to heightened conflict. Judicial and departmental guidelines emphasize the use of proportionality in force, and in instances of passive resistance, officers are encouraged to utilize communication and negotiation to resolve the situation peacefully.

Utilizing less force in these scenarios is not only legally justified but also aligns with best practices for community policing and maintaining public trust. The goal is to resolve conflicts without resorting to violence, which is more achievable in cases of passive rather than active resistance or imminent threats.