Force options must be exercised in good faith and must not exceed what?

The principle that force options must not exceed the reasonably necessary amount of force is rooted in the concept of proportionality and necessity in law enforcement. When officers encounter situations that may require the use of force, they are obligated to assess the circumstances and respond in a manner that is appropriate to the threat or resistance they face.

This ensures that the level of force used is appropriate to achieve lawful objectives such as self-defense, the protection of others, or the timely apprehension of a suspect. Using more force than necessary can lead to excessive force claims and can compromise the safety and rights of individuals involved.

In contrast, relying solely on an officer's training standards, company policy, or individual discretion alone does not provide a sufficient standard to gauge the appropriateness of the force used, as these measures may vary and could lead to inconsistency or misapplication in real-life scenarios. Thus, the principle of using a reasonably necessary amount of force is critical in maintaining accountability and upholding ethical standards in law enforcement practices.